ReviewArchives of pharmacal research2026
Liver organoids for chemical risk assessment: biological fidelity, standardization, and context-of-use frameworks.
Review in Archives of pharmacal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liver organoids are emerging as human-relevant three-dimensional in vitro systems for chemical safety assessment, however, their application value depends on their ability to generate decision-ready evidence within clearly defined context-of-use (CoU). Here, we review the biological fidelity, quality assessment, exposure characterization, and validation requirements of liver organoids across three CoUs: (1) hazard screening and identification, (2) mechanistic elucidation of hazard, and (3) quantitative risk assessment support. Within this CoU framework, we review recent advances in liver organoids and their applications to chemical safety assessment, highlighting models that already provide useful evidence and those where implementation remains partial or inconsistent. Based on this review, we discuss the major barriers to broader regulatory adoption, which include insufficient biological implementation, limited reproducibility, insufficient exposure characterization, and a lack of harmonized performance criteria and standardization frameworks. By evaluating liver organoids in relation to clearly defined decision questions rather than generalized technological promise, this review clarifies their current contributions, explains why their contributions remain CoU-dependent, and outlines key priorities for developing decision-ready liver organoid platforms for next-generation chemical safety assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42313351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.