Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313349›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2026

Novel Clinical and Pre-clinical Obesity Estimates in Older Indian Adults: Insights from a Nationally Representative Dataset.

Madhur Verma, Pritam Halder, Aditi Aditi, Nitin Kapoor, Vandana Esht, Waseem Mumtaz Ahamed, Rakesh Kakkar, Sanjay Kalra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madhur VermaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, 15100, India.
Pritam HalderDepartment of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2407-6807
Aditi AditiInternational Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.
Nitin KapoorEndocrinology, Department of Endocrine, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College, Vellore, TN, 632004, India.
Vandana EshtPhysical Therapy Department, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Jazan University, 45142, Jizan, Saudi Arabia.
Waseem Mumtaz AhamedPhysical Therapy Department, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Jazan University, 45142, Jizan, Saudi Arabia.
Rakesh KakkarDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, 151001, India.
Sanjay KalraDepartment of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, India. brideknl@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-121X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesity is a multifactorial condition that is not well captured by conventional anthropometry. Emerging frameworks, including the Lancet Commission approach, objectively stratify obesity and provide a more clinically informative characterization of the burden. The present study compares obesity estimates based on conventional BMI criteria with those derived using the revised framework and examines the distribution and determinants of pre-clinical and clinical obesity (CO) among older Indian adults.

methodsWe used data from the first wave of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (2017-2018), including 59,854 adults aged ≥ 45 years. A high body mass index (BMI; > 25 kg/m

resultsWeighted prevalence of high BMI was 27.1% (95% confidence interval: CI 21.5-33.5), while the prevalence of pre-clinical obesity and CO was 27.0% (21.4-33.4) and 15.1% (10.9-20.6), respectively. CO showed marked geographic variation, with the lowest prevalence in Central India (7.77%) and the highest in South India (24.33%); Meghalaya had the lowest state-level prevalence (4.52%) and Chandigarh the highest (37.88%). Women, urban residents, and participants with higher education and wealth had higher odds of both obesity states. Participants with pre-clinical obesity more often reported excellent self-rated health, whereas poor self-rated health was more common among those with CO.

conclusionThe revised framework meaningfully differentiates high BMI burden into pre-clinical and CO and identified sociodemographic and spatial disparities. Such classification may help distinguish excess adiposity from obesity with morbidity and functional limitation, although interpretation should remain cautious given the proxy operationalization possible within survey data.

Indexed as

Body fat percentageClinical obesityDisparities in healthNon-communicable diseasesOlder adultsPre-clinical obesity

Identifiers

PMID42313349
PMCPMC13457515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.