Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313328›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026

Community Health Workers in Perinatal Mental Health: Feasibility and Challenges of Implementing a Task-Sharing Model.

Seethalakshmi Ramanathan, Robert Keefe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seethalakshmi RamanathanMaxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affiars, Syracuse University, NY, Syracuse, USA.
Robert KeefeUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, NY, Buffalo, USA. rhkeefe@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-7193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their long history of working with infants and new birthing persons, community health workers (CHWs) could be better utilized to help address the emotional needs of individuals who recently gave birth. We adapted the Thinking Healthy Program (THP), a World Health Organization-endorsed task-sharing model, to assess the feasibility of implementing THP in six community-based organizations (CBOs) in central and western New York. We present results on the feasibility and acceptability from the CHWs, their supervisors, and chief executives of six community-based organizations. Qualitative interviews with stakeholders were carried out prior to program launch, soliciting their input on the role of CHWs and challenges related to implementing the task-sharing approach for working with persons with perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs). Feedback on knowledge, comfort, confidence and overall ability were collected from CHWs and their supervisors at baseline and post-implementation (i.e., after implementation with two clients). Qualitative interviews identified three themes: 1) the community's need for CHW engagement; 2) the current CHW roles in the management of maternal health, including PMADs; and 3) the CBO/CHWs' ongoing need for resources to continue providing task-sharing approaches. Post-implementation surveys of CHWs revealed mixed results. Although CHWs stated their knowledge, comfort, and confidence in maternal mental health declined, their supervisors noted improvements in the CHWs' skillset. Our findings highlight critical challenges associated with implementing task-sharing approaches that engage CHWs to address PMADs. Our results suggest the need for attention to organizational context; sustained supervision; and strategies to address workforce turnover, burnout, and role clarity.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.