ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Penile curvature surgery in contemporary practice: effectiveness, satisfaction, and complications after corporoplasty in a tertiary referral center.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePenile curvature due to Peyronie's disease (PD) or congenital penile curvature (CPC) may impair sexual function and quality of life. We aimed to evaluate effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction after corporoplasty at a tertiary referral center.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 324 men undergoing corporoplasty between 2020 and 2025. Patients were stratified according to curvature etiology (PD vs. CPC) and surgical technique (16-dot plication, Yachia, modified Nesbit, Surgisis grafting). Curvature severity was assessed during pharmacologically induced erection and classified as mild (< 30°), moderate (30-60°), or severe (> 60°). Outcomes assessed at 6-48 months included postoperative erectile function (IIEF-5), Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ-1/GAQ-2), satisfaction, complications, side effects, anesthesia type, and operative setting.
results274 (84.6%) had PD and 50 (15.4%) CPC. Moderate curvature was present in 217 (67%) patients and severe curvature in 100 (31%). Local anesthesia was used in 256 (79%) cases, and 253 (78.1%) procedures were ambulatory. Overall, 181 (56%) patients reported normal postoperative erectile function, 211 (65%) improved sexual quality of life, and 249 (77%) satisfaction with surgery. Descriptively, CPC patients showed higher rates of preserved postoperative erectile function than PD patients (47 [94%] vs. 137 [50%]). Complete straightening was achieved in 298 (92%) patients, while re-curvature occurred in 26 (8%). Complications developed in 67 (20.7%) patients and side effects in 89 (27.5%), penile shortening being the most common.
conclusionsCorporoplasty provided high anatomical success and favorable patient satisfaction in both PD and CPC. CPC patients showed descriptively more favorable functional and satisfaction outcomes, while penile shortening and re-curvature represented the main determinants of dissatisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42313324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.