ArticleHealth & justice2026
Validation of self‑harm prediction models among formerly incarcerated individuals using health data.
Article in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals released from jail die by self‑harm at nearly nine times the rate of the general U.S. POPULATION: Most jails rely on traditional screening methods, such as brief self-report questionnaires, which are often inconsistently administered and have limited sensitivity and predictive accuracy. This highlights the urgent need for alternative self-harm risk identification methods during and after incarceration.
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of applying an existing self-harm risk prediction model to jail populations.
methodsWe analyzed data from 4,154 individuals incarcerated in Michigan jails who were enrolled in Medicaid. We applied a prediction model, originally developed by the Mental Health Research Network (MHRN), to identify individuals at elevated risk for self-harm. Predictors included demographics, mental health and substance use diagnoses, medical comorbidities, prior history of self-harm, mental health-related hospitalizations, and dispensing of psychotropic medications.
resultsThe study cohort was predominantly male (70%) and racially diverse (50% Black, 43% White), with a median jail stay of just one day. Overall, the model demonstrated good discrimination, achieving a C-statistic of 0.77, with 68% sensitivity and 77% specificity, and a 99% negative predictive value. Notably, among individuals with shorter jail stays, predictive performance was better, with the C-statistic increasing to 0.80.
conclusionsHealth records-based models demonstrated good predictive performance and may offer a scalable, data-driven alternative to traditional screening tools in jails. Integrating health records-based risk prediction tools in jails could improve early detection of self-harm risk and support more targeted prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.