ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Impedance changes in chronic vagus nerve stimulator implantation in epileptic dogs.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational modelling of the electrical fields generated by helical electrodes surrounding the vagus nerve suggested a current of 1.0 mA should depolarise enough axons to give a therapeutic effect in epilepsy. An assumption that fibrous tissue formation would form between the electrodes and the nerve in implantable vagus nerve stimulators (VNS) led to the recommendation that 1.5 mA should be used to account for the increased impedance this would cause. This increase in impedance has not been documented, meaning that the higher current might not be necessary and could produce avoidable adverse effects such as coughing. To test the hypotheses that impedance does not always increase following VNS implantation and that more adverse effects might be seen with lower impedance circuits, circuit impedance was measured in dogs with implantable VNS at implantation and compared to impedance at 3-6 months post-implantation and at non-standardised time points thereafter. Dogs were grouped by severity of their coughing and the impedance between groups at 3-6 months was compared. Mean impedance at first implantation (2219Ω, 95% CI 1894-2544) was no different from impedance at 3-6 months post implantation (2257Ω, 95%CI 1944-2570, p = .80). Only 2 of 17 dogs showed a > 50% increase in impedance (one at 3-6 and one at 7-12 months). Coughing severity was not influenced by impedance value despite similar stimulation currents. This work shows impedance does not consistently increase post implantation in dogs with VNS, suggesting that currents > 1.0 mA might not be routinely needed to achieve a therapeutic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.