Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313250›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

Expertise of European Clinical Trial Units in Conducting and Managing Cross-Border Pediatric Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases.

Begonya Nafria, Segolene Gaillard, Martine Dehlinger-Kremer, Pamela Dicks, Ricardo M Fernandes, Pirkko Lepola, Gunter F Egger, Lucy Bray, Barbara E Bierer, Bob Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Begonya NafriaPatient Engagement in Research Department, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu (IRSJD), Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain. begonya.nafria@sjd.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4494-3663
Segolene GaillardEuropean Young Person's Advisory Groups Network - eYPAGnet, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-7366
Martine Dehlinger-KremerUCB Biosciences, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8219-7809
Pamela DicksEuropean Young Person's Advisory Groups Network - eYPAGnet, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1696-0757
Ricardo M FernandesConect4children-Stichting, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-6475
Pirkko LepolaHelsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9663-0872
Gunter F EggerEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1354-3522
Lucy BrayEdge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-3233
Barbara E BiererMulti-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6448-8170
Bob PhillipsCandlelighters' Supportive Care Research Centre, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConducting pediatric clinical trials across borders in Europe presents unique challenges, especially when studies target rare conditions, require specialized expertise at participating sites, and demand active family involvement in the research process. Including international patients in clinical trials is essential for both scientific development and equity in healthcare, but it requires adapting study protocols, informed consent processes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to ensure trial feasibility in diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. The current regulatory and legislative frameworks offer limited solutions to address the language barriers and logistical complexities that still limit cross-border access to clinical trials. The aim of this study was to investigate the experience, expertise, and practices of managing international participants in the pediatric clinical trials conducted by clinical trial units (CTUs) in 17 European countries.

methodsTo assess experiences with cross-border pediatric clinical trials for rare diseases across multiple domains, three online surveys were developed and disseminated to Clinical Trial Units (CTUs) within healthcare organizations across Europe. The first survey captured information on general expertise, the second focused on reported good practices in trials involving international patients, and the third aimed to identify documented cases of discrimination, particularly those related to native language requirements. All surveys were reviewed by an expert advisory board and distributed through multiple European research networks and other channels. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 43 CTUs from 17 European countries participated in this study, representing a mix of children's hospitals, general hospitals, and university hospitals. International patients who travelled to the 43 CTUs to participate in clinical trials came from 81 different European and non-European countries, mostly from Morocco, Ukraine, Ecuador, and Venezuela. Among the reported good practices supporting cross-border access (N = 113), the most common involved providing written and verbal translations of informed consent documents, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and quality of life (QoL) scales when these were not available in patients' native languages. Twenty cases of discrimination were reported, primarily due to language requirements included in eligibility criteria, which negatively affected trial access for non-native speakers. Most of these cases occurred in industry-sponsored trials for rare diseases (65%, n = 13), which imposed significant logistical burdens, including frequent visits and overnight stays at the hospitals conducting the trial.

conclusionsWhile some progress has been made in enabling cross-border access to pediatric clinical trials in Europe, substantial barriers remain, particularly regarding native language diversity and support services for international patients and their families. Systemic changes are needed, including routine translations of study materials, professional interpretation, adaptation of PROMs, and the establishment of dedicated support structures. Collaboration across Europe will be necessary to harmonize language requirements when scientifically justified in the eligibility criteria, promote decentralized trial models, and ensure equitable access to clinical trials for all children, regardless of native language or nationality.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicRare DiseasesChildEuropeHumansInformed ConsentPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical trial unitsCross-border clinical trialsInformed consent processLanguage accommodationPediatricPROMsQuality of life scalesRare diseases

Identifiers

PMID42313250
PMCPMC13525932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.