ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Stem Cell Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Translational Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Trials.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stem cell and stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle therapy for traumatic brain injury: mechanisms, engineering and translation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of persistent cognitive, motor, and neuropsychiatric impairment, arising from both the initial mechanical insult and a prolonged cascade of secondary injury processes. While primary injury reflects structural damage, secondary mechanisms, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and blood-brain barrier disruption, evolve over time and critically influence long-term outcomes. Despite extensive investigation, therapies targeting isolated components of secondary injury have demonstrated limited clinical success, highlighting the need for approaches that support coordinated neural repair. Stem cell-based therapies have emerged as a promising neurorestorative strategy. Rather than replacing lost neurons directly, transplanted cells primarily act through paracrine signaling, immunomodulation, neurotrophic support, and preservation of vulnerable neural networks. However, clinical translation has been constrained by heterogeneity in cell sources, delivery routes, treatment timing, and outcome measures, limiting mechanistic interpretability across trials. This review presents a mechanism-aligned translational framework linking injury stage, biological targets, route of administration, and clinically meaningful outcomes across stages of TBI. We integrate current knowledge of post-injury repair mechanisms with evidence from recent human clinical trials of stem cell therapies. Particular emphasis is placed on safety, feasibility, and emerging signals across structural and functional endpoints, as well as how injury stage, biological targets, delivery strategies, and meaningful endpoints interact to shape treatment responsiveness and inform biomarker-guided clinical trial design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.