Article3D printing in medicine2026
Development of a new operative 3D printed template-cranioplasty-concept for performing craniotomy in the posterior cranial fossa and validation of the system using a 3D printed simulation model: a preclinical feasibility study.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe retrosigmoid approach is a standard surgical route used for the treatment of various tumors and vascular lesions in the cerebellopontine angle. However, postoperative reconstruction of the surgical defect could remain challenging, particularly in cases requiring intraoperative extension. For this reason, a novel concept was developed to define the surgical approach and enable precise defect coverage using a patient-specific implant. This concept was designed to be patient-specific and realized through 3D printing.
methodsThe developed 3D printed template-implant concept was designed to facilitate precise craniotomy. The template is used as a stencil and a surgical marker is applied to delineate the implant contours directly on the patient's skull. This outline subsequently serves as a guide for where to perform the craniotomy and defines its boundaries. The custom-fit implant replicates the template design and ensures complete coverage of the craniotomy defect, while allowing intraoperative adjustment if required. Preclinical testing was conducted on a 3D printed simulation model representing the posterior cranial fossa (surgical area). The novel concept was tested by nine senior and attending neurosurgeons from the University Hospital Leipzig. Bilateral craniotomies were performed using the template and subsequently closed with the implant. The fit of the implant was evaluated using CT scans. The time required for preparation, including craniotomy, as well as for post-procedure handling, including implant placement, was recorded.
resultsThe average gap of the new concept was 2.11 mm, which was significantly smaller than that of the current standard approach (5.52 mm) and showed lower variability. The entire procedure, including craniotomy and implant placement, took an average of 13 min and 20 s.
conclusionThe novel template-implant concept for retrosigmoid approaches improves defect coverage and reduces gap sizes. Furthermore, it demonstrates the potential of 3D printed patient-specific implants for more precise and predictable surgical procedures, although further studies are required to validate efficiency and clinical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.