ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026
Radiomics-enhanced
Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveReliable assessment of cerebral amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition is essential for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of integrating radiomics-enhanced MATERIALS AND
methodsNinety-four subjects who underwent (
resultsThe combined feature achieved the best performance with the LR model, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.9373, accuracy = 0.8723, F1-score = 0.898). SHAP analysis identified biologically meaningful features derived from both radiomics and PET modalities, showing clear inter-group separation. In Centiloid regression, the ExtraTrees model achieved strong agreement with measured values.
conclusionThis framework provides an interpretable and quantitative solution for amyloid evaluation, enabling both categorical Aβ status discrimination and continuous Centiloid estimation from routine PET/MRI data. This approach represents a proof-of-concept for supporting RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrates that radiomics-enhanced PET/MR features can reliably predict both Aβ status and Centiloid values without specialized processing platforms, offering a clinically deployable, standardized, and interpretable approach to improve AD diagnosis and monitoring. KEY POINTS: Radiomics-enhanced
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.