ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
MGMT promoter methylation across glioma subtypes: biological relevance, treatment response, and survival outcomes.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gliomas are molecularly heterogeneous central nervous system tumors with variable treatment responsiveness and survival outcomes. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is an important biomarker because it is associated with reduced DNA repair capacity and increased sensitivity to alkylating agents, particularly temozolomide (TMZ). However, its clinical meaning is not uniform across glioma subtypes and should not be interpreted as a universal prognostic marker. In IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, MGMT promoter methylation has the strongest evidence as a predictive biomarker for benefit from TMZ-containing therapy, although survival advantages in treated cohorts should be interpreted mainly as treatment-associated effects unless treatment-independent prognostic value is demonstrated. In IDH-mutant astrocytoma, MGMT methylation may partly reflect IDH-associated global hypermethylation and appears to have limited independent clinical value. In IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma, MGMT methylation may provide supportive, treatment-context-dependent information, particularly in patients receiving alkylating chemotherapy. In pediatric-type and rare molecularly defined gliomas, including histone-altered tumors, MGMT status remains exploratory and should be interpreted alongside methylation class, lineage-defining alterations, tumor location, and treatment history. Technical factors, including assay platform, CpG-site selection, cutoff definition, tissue quality, tumor-cell content, and intratumoral heterogeneity, further complicate interpretation. Because MGMT methylation is biologically continuous, this review further argues that borderline results should be reported as gray-zone or intermediate categories when validated, and that quantitative methylation values should be integrated into subtype-aware multivariable models rather than being reduced exclusively to binary calls. This review summarizes the biological and clinical relevance of MGMT promoter methylation across glioma subtypes and proposes a subtype-aware, treatment-conditional, and assay-aware framework for interpreting its predictive and survival-related significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42313202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.