ArticleHippocampus2026
Neural and Navigational Features Influencing the Novelty Induced Benefits on Episodic Memory.
Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies in animals have robustly shown that exposure to novelty can promote memory for information presented in the temporal vicinity. In humans, however, evidence for such novelty-related memory benefits has been mixed. In this EEG study, we investigated the neurobiological mechanisms underlying effects of novelty on memory and whether individual differences in exploration patterns help explain these inconsistencies. We examined the role of theta oscillations in exploring a novel or familiar environment as well as whether spatial exploration behavior can modulate the beneficial effects of novelty on memory. Participants first explored one of two virtual environments and subsequently explored the same (familiar condition) or a new environment (novel condition). After exploring novel and familiar environments, participants performed a word learning task followed by a free recall and recognition memory test. Neurologically, exploration of the familiar rather than novel environment increased theta power, which may reflect environment-related memory processes. However, we did not observe any differences in theta power associated with successful encoding of words after exploring a novel versus familiar environment. Behaviorally, no main effect of novelty on free recall was observed. Crucially, when accounting for variance in spatial exploration patterns, words encoded after exploring a novel environment were recalled better than words encoded after exploring a familiar environment. Furthermore, an interaction effect between the condition and exploratory behavior revealed that increased exploration benefitted free recall specifically in the familiar condition. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the way in which individuals explore a virtual environment when examining novelty effects on memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.