Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42313073›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2026

Neural and Navigational Features Influencing the Novelty Induced Benefits on Episodic Memory.

David A Vogelsang, Carla Maló Calmus, Madeleine Vohs, Kreeta I L Kerkkänen, Svetlin Hansov, Judith Schomaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A VogelsangFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6135-6025
Carla Maló CalmusMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Madeleine VohsFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Kreeta I L KerkkänenFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Svetlin HansovFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Judith SchomakerFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in animals have robustly shown that exposure to novelty can promote memory for information presented in the temporal vicinity. In humans, however, evidence for such novelty-related memory benefits has been mixed. In this EEG study, we investigated the neurobiological mechanisms underlying effects of novelty on memory and whether individual differences in exploration patterns help explain these inconsistencies. We examined the role of theta oscillations in exploring a novel or familiar environment as well as whether spatial exploration behavior can modulate the beneficial effects of novelty on memory. Participants first explored one of two virtual environments and subsequently explored the same (familiar condition) or a new environment (novel condition). After exploring novel and familiar environments, participants performed a word learning task followed by a free recall and recognition memory test. Neurologically, exploration of the familiar rather than novel environment increased theta power, which may reflect environment-related memory processes. However, we did not observe any differences in theta power associated with successful encoding of words after exploring a novel versus familiar environment. Behaviorally, no main effect of novelty on free recall was observed. Crucially, when accounting for variance in spatial exploration patterns, words encoded after exploring a novel environment were recalled better than words encoded after exploring a familiar environment. Furthermore, an interaction effect between the condition and exploratory behavior revealed that increased exploration benefitted free recall specifically in the familiar condition. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the way in which individuals explore a virtual environment when examining novelty effects on memory.

Indexed as

BrainExploratory BehaviorMemory, EpisodicSpatial NavigationTheta RhythmAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyVirtual RealityYoung Adultepisodic memorynoveltyroaming entropyspatial navigationtheta oscillations

Identifiers

PMID42313073
PMCPMC13277633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.