ReviewHealth policy and planning2026
Health facilities as a lever for birth registration in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review.
Review in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The health system has been identified as a key lever for increasing access to birth registration (BR) directly after birth. BR is critical for upholding human rights and accessing essential services, yet many low- and middle-income countries struggle with low BR rates. In this realist synthesis, we reviewed literature on two separate interventions that are designed to increase access to BR services. This included (i) embedding or appointing an official to register births in health facilities and (ii) incorporating education on BR in routine perinatal care programmes. This study aimed to support the knowledge base on how these interventions work, why, and for whom, within health facility contexts. We followed the RAMESES I publication guidelines for realist syntheses. Iterative searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search also included grey literature, policy documents, and insights from a key informant in South Africa. We adopted an iterative cycle of searches guided by review team exchanges, stakeholders' insights, and sequential snowballing searches for theory and background information. We developed two initial programme theories, presented as ICAMO configurations, that were then refined against empirical evidence from 17 included studies, with publication dates ranging from 1992 to 2021. Our review findings highlight that the interventions improved BR rates by lowering logistical barriers, raising awareness, and supporting BR staff, (i.e. personnel responsible for conducting BR within health facilities). Literature from low- and middle-income countries suggests that the effectiveness of facility-level BR interventions is often affected by access to care, travel distances, and transportation costs, as well as by the availability of resources, BR infrastructure, and staff motivation within healthcare facilities. These factors may, in turn, affect BR demand, parents' self-efficacy, and the extent to which BR initiatives align with parents' real-life contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.