ArticleEmergency medicine international2026
Geographic Validation of the SADFUL Scores for Identifying Bacteremia in the Unscheduled Emergency Department Revisit Cohorts.
Article in Emergency medicine international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geographic Validation of the SADFUL Scores for Identifying Bacteremia in the Unscheduled Emergency Department Revisit Cohorts.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The SADFUL score is developed to identify bacteremia in emergency department revisits (EDR), but its generalizability in various healthcare facilities and superiority over other scores remain unclear. This study aims to validate the SADFUL score in two hospitals with different levels of care. Method: This retrospective cohort study included adult EDR patients from an academic medical center (Hospital A) and a rural regional hospital (Hospital B) between March 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022. The SADFUL, quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, and shock index (SI) scores were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: The prevalence of bacteremia in the EDR cohort was 2.2% (120/5455). The SADFUL score's performance was inconsistent across the two hospitals. In Hospital A, its AUROC of 0.64 was significantly higher than those of the SIRS criteria, qSOFA, and the SI. In contrast, in Hospital B, its numerically higher AUROC of 0.72 was not statistically superior to the other scores. The optimal cutoff also differed between the two settings (≥ 2 in Hospital A and ≥ 4 in Hospital B). Conclusion: The SADFUL score demonstrated only modest accuracy and was not consistently superior to other commonly used clinical scoring systems. Overall, all evaluated tools exhibited limited utility in identifying bacteremia among EDR patients, highlighting the need for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.