ArticleHealth services insights2026
Reducing Wait-Times for Orthopaedic Consultations for Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Through Advanced Practice Physiotherapy.
Article in Health services insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long wait-times for orthopaedic consultation in public hospitals, particularly for knee osteoarthritis patients, may be ameliorated when Advanced Practice Physiotherapists (APPs) are integrated into clinical pathways. APPs provide expert comprehensive assessment, accurately identifying patients not requiring surgery. This study aimed to quantify wait-time between general practitioner (GP) referral and consultation with an APP or surgeon outcomes following service changes including increased resourcing of the APP clinics. Method: This knowledge translation project was evaluated by comparing wait-time to consultation for three, 6-month cohorts from 1 March to 30 September, totalling 563 patients, at baseline in 2022, and post-intervention at year 1 (2023) and year 2 (2024). Evidence-based service changes included expanding APP clinic capacity and improving referral pathways to community osteoarthritis and obesity programs. The proportion of patients seen by APPs rose from 20% at baseline (2022) to 81% in 2023 and 76% in 2024. Concurrently, the health service implemented a digital medical records system. Data were analysed for patient characteristics, wait-times, care pathways (APP, surgeon, or both), and consultation outcomes. Results: Compared to 2022, wait-times to consultation significantly reduced. Median wait-time fell from 114 days in 2022 to 45 days (86% less) in 2023 and 46 days (90% less) in 2024. Patients seen by APPs experienced fewer delays (Incidence risk ratio (IRR): 0.55; 95% CI: 0.43-0.72), including those seen in both APP and surgeon clinics (IRR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.41-0.70). Total patients listed for surgery declined from 48% in 2022, to 36% in 2023, and 35% in 2024, while patients directed to a surgeon were twice as likely to need knee replacement in 2023, 2024. Conclusions: Shorter wait-times appear linked to increased APP clinic activity, improved digital systems, and enhanced access to community programs. These changes supported clinical standards and timely care for patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.