Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42312129›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2026

Decoding basal ganglia motor circuit dysfunction from handwriting: a physics-informed neural signal interpretation framework for Parkinson's disease screening.

Krishnan Batri, S Lakshmi, Salabat Khan, Zeshan Iqbal, Mohammad Alhefdi, Ghada Atteia, Sivaram Murugan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krishnan BatriDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India.
S LakshmiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India.
Salabat KhanFaculty of Computer Studies, Arab Open University, A'ali, Bahrain.
Zeshan IqbalDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Sivas, Türkiye.
Mohammad AlhefdiComputer Engineering Department, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ghada AtteiaDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sivaram MuruganDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sivas University of Science and Technology, Sivas, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decoding of latent neural states from observable signals is a key focus of modern brain-AI research. Although most neural decoding models are based on electrophysiological recordings, peripheral motor outputs also convey information about circuit-level dynamics. Handwriting is a channeled behavioral signal that indexes the health of the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop. In Parkinson's disease (PD), dopaminergic loss disrupts this circuit, leading to tremor oscillations, micrographia, and movement irregularities. The challenge of decoding behavior-encoded neural signals from handwriting images constitutes a principled neural signal interpretation problem. We propose a physics-informed and interpretable AI framework for decoding basal ganglia motor dysfunction through harmonic oscillator perturbation analysis. Six energy-inspired measures are extracted to quantify different aspects of motor system dynamics: intensity variation, spatial gradients, multi-scale stability, deviation variability, directional anisotropy, and cross-scale interactions. The transparent mapping between computational models and neurophysiological processes is enabled by these steps, which have their basis in mechanistic theories of amplitude modulation and oscillatory instability. High levels of discrimination were achieved when 594 handwriting trials (279 with PD and 315 controls) were assessed using repeated 10-fold cross-validation for spiral, circle, and meander tasks. Support Vector Machines achieved 84.06% accuracy and 93.56% sensitivity, with highly significant group differences across all features (

Indexed as

basal ganglia motor circuitcorticostriatal circuit biomarkershandwriting analysisinterpretable machine learningmotor state interpretationneural signal decodingneurodegenerative disease screeningParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID42312129
PMCPMC13269255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.