ArticleFrontiers in transplantation2026
Variability and longitudinal dynamics of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney and liver recipients: a comparison of absolute and relative quantities in plasma and urine.
Article in Frontiers in transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) is increasingly being integrated into clinical practice for detecting allograft rejection in solid organ recipients. Natural fluctuations in ddcfDNA or other conditions can affect interpretation. Therefore, we investigated ddcfDNA trends in kidney (KT) and liver (LT) recipients over the first 2 years post-transplantation, assessing intra- and inter-individual variability in absolute and relative quantities. Additionally, we analysed urinary ddcfDNA in KT alongside plasma ddcfDNA and other biomarkers. Methods: Blood and urine from KT and LT were collected longitudinally at regular visits. Mismatched Results: We found comparable inter- and intra-individual variability in stable KT plasma for both absolute and fractional ddcfDNA. In stable and nonstable LT plasma, intra-individual variability accounted for most of the total variance. Urinary ddcfDNA in KT showed inter-sex variability in fractional quantities. Conclusions: The large contribution of intra-individual variability suggests including individual ddcfDNA dynamics in addition to fixed cut-offs for the detection of allograft injury. In LT and urinary ddcfDNA in KT, ddcfDNA_cpml should be considered alongside ddcfDNA%, as they seem to directly represent the allograft status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.