ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Machine learning prediction of sepsis in paralytic ileus using interpretable clinical models.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paralytic ileus (PI) is a common complication in critically ill patients, and the development of sepsis significantly worsens prognosis. Early identification of sepsis risk in PI patients remains a clinical challenge. Methods: Adult PI patients were identified from the MIMIC-IV database (2008-2022) and randomly split into a training cohort (70%) and an internal validation cohort (30%). An independent external cohort was obtained from Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital. Predictors were extracted within the first 12 hours after admission. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm combined with clinical knowledge. Seven machine learning models were evaluated. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHAP was applied for interpretability. Results: A total of 579 PI patients were included, of whom 29.78% developed new-onset sepsis. Seven predictors were retained: pneumonia, red cell distribution width (RDW), heart failure, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), atrial fibrillation, serum chloride, and white blood cell count. Logistic regression demonstrated stable performance and was selected as the final model, achieving an AUC of 0.687 in internal validation and 0.715 in external validation. Calibration and DCA indicated good agreement and consistent clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis identified pneumonia and RDW as the most influential predictors. Conclusion: An early, interpretable logistic regression model based on readily available clinical variables can effectively predict new-onset sepsis in PI patients and may support timely risk stratification and preventive intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.