ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Socially Transformative Aesthetics: Real-World Evidence of Positive First Impressions After Pan-Facial Aesthetic Treatments.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive, pan-facial aesthetic treatments rejuvenate and improve facial appearance and may impact social interactions and perceptions. Objectives: This observational pilot study used video recordings and in-person evaluations to assess social perceptions of participants before and after pan-facial treatment. Methods: Adults receiving pan-facial injectable treatments (ie, onabotulinumtoxinA [Botox Cosmetic, Allergan Aesthetics, Westport, Ireland], hyaluronic acid fillers [Juvéderm; Allergan Aesthetics, Irvine, California], or both) were invited to participate. Three measures were developed to assess perceptions of attractiveness, approachability, naturalness, trustworthiness, healthiness, and age from nonclinical observer, patient participant, and clinician perspectives: the Pan-Facial Treatment Outcome Survey, the Participant Perception of Appearance, and the Clinician Perception of Appearance. Results: Twenty-seven participants received treatment and provided video recordings, with 16 videos ( Conclusions: Pan-facial treatments may positively impact social perceptions and self-assessments of facial appearance. These benefits extend beyond physical appearance, including improving overall social interactions and personal well-being. Level of Evidence 5 Therapeutic: For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.