ArticleJournal of mammalogy2026
Assessment of spatial and temporal overlap between wildcats (
Article in Journal of mammalogy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presence of domestic species can cause multiple impacts on natural ecosystems, especially when wild close relatives are also present. The European Wildcat is an excellent example, facing major conservation threats due to the presence of domestic cats in natural environments. Their interactions can result in varying levels of hybridization, disease transmission, and ecological competition across different regions. Here, we studied spatiotemporal overlap of both species using over 300 camera traps located in more than 30 plots across Catalonia (NE Spain). Occupancy and detectability of the wildcat were not significantly influenced by the relative abundance of domestic cats. However, we observed a high spatial segregation between both species, which could help to explain the relatively low hybridization rate in this area. Daily activity patterns of the 2 cat species showed higher overlap during the mating period than during the non-mating period. Domestic cat activity patterns shifted in those areas with presence of wildcats only during the non-mating period, while the presence of domestic cats had no effect on wildcat activity. Thus, wildcat estrus could influence the activity times of domestic cats, whose active hours show increased overlap with those of wildcats during the mating period. Wildcat conservation measures could focus on enhancing spatial segregation in those regions where hybridization is more persistent, reducing domestic cat incursions in natural areas, while monitoring wildcat distribution and range expansion into areas with a high risk of encounters with domestic cats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.