Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311956›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Primary care2026

Population expectations of primary care quality in 18 countries: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the People's Voice Survey.

Todd P Lewis, Shalom Sabwa, Joao Breda, Susanne Carai, Emma Clarke-Deelder, Svetlana V Doubova, Günther Fink, Patricia J Garcia, Ezequiel Garcia-Elorrio, Hwa-Young Lee and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Todd P LewisSchool of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Shalom SabwaRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joao BredaWHO Regional Office for Europe, Athens, Greece.
Susanne CaraiWHO Regional Office for Europe, Athens, Greece.
Emma Clarke-DeelderSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Svetlana V DoubovaEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico.
Günther FinkSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Patricia J GarciaSchool of Public Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Ezequiel Garcia-ElorrioInstitute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hwa-Young LeeGraduate School of Public Health and Healthcare Management, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Sailesh MohanCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Inbarani NaidooHuman Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Juhwan OhSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Emelda A OkiroPopulation and Health Impact Surveillance Group, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ashenif TadeleHealth System Research Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Rosanna TarriconeDepartment of Social and Political Science and CERGAS-SDA Bocconi, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Marius-Ionuț UngureanuBabeş-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Xiaohui WangDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Dong Roman XuAcacia Lab for Implementation Science, Southern Medical University Institute for Global Health and Center for WHO Studies, School of Health Management and Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Margaret E KrukSchool of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Expectations for health-care quality affect how populations rate primary care, influencing tolerance of poor-quality care and demand for improvement, yet how expectations align with standards of practice remains poorly understood. We aimed to measure population expectations of primary care and their determinants within and across countries. Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis, we used nationally representative data from the People's Voice Survey collected between May 9, 2022, and Dec 21, 2023, in Ethiopia, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Colombia, Peru, Mexico, Argentina (Province of Mendoza), Uruguay, Laos, India, China, South Korea, Romania, Greece, Italy, the UK, and the USA. Adults aged 18 years and older with at least one health-care visit in the past 12 months were included. Expectations were assessed using two anchoring vignettes, one depicting poor-quality primary care and one depicting adequate-quality primary care, administered via a mobile telephone survey, household interview, or nationally representative web panels. Respondents rated each vignette on a Likert scale: poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent. Low expectations were defined as rating the poor-quality care vignette as fair, good, very good, or excellent, and high expectations were defined as rating the adequate-quality care vignette as poor, fair, or good. Multivariable logistic regression models identified determinants of expectations, including covariates covering demographics, health status, care utilisation and experience, and system competence. Findings: Among 18 312 respondents (10 000 [54·6%] female and 8312 [45·4%] male; mean age 44 years [SD 17]), 2955 (16·1%) rated poor-quality primary care as fair or better and 11 787 (64·4%) rated adequate-quality primary care as less than very good. The proportion of respondents with low expectations of primary care ranged from 70 (6·3%) of 1112 in the UK to 530 (41·1%) of 1290 in South Korea. The proportion of respondents with high expectations of primary care ranged from 563 (40·1%) of 1404 in Nigeria to 494 (85·0%) of 581 in Italy. Older age, female gender, higher educational attainment, higher income, and use of private care ( Interpretation: Populations can often misjudge primary care quality, with substantial cross-national variation. Recognising and measuring expectations are essential for accurately interpreting health system ratings and guiding efforts to improve primary care. Policy makers should invest in strategies that strengthen health literacy and patient activation, empowering populations to recognise and demand high-quality primary care. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Inter-American Development Bank, the Eckenstein-Geigy Professorship, Initiative on the Future of Health and Economic Resiliency in Africa, National Natural Science Foundation of China, WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the Taejae Foundation.

Identifiers

PMID42311956
PMCPMC13269253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.