ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2026
Public trust in AI-enabled telemedicine: affective, cognitive, and structural dimensions insights from multi-platform big data analytics.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare delivery, with telemedicine emerging as one of its most viable and socially impactful applications, raising important questions about how public trust is formed and sustained in AI-enabled healthcare environments. Yet, despite rapid technological adoption, public trust in AI-enabled telemedicine remains insufficiently understood, particularly across the diverse online environments where perceptions are collectively shaped. This study employs a sociotechnical, multi-platform big data analytics approach to quantify and interpret public trust in large-scale digital discourse. A total of 25,396 online mentions collected between 14 September and 14 October 2025 from news, social media, blogs, video, and web platforms were analyzed using a hybrid framework combining lexicon-based sentiment analysis (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.