Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311924›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2026

Compartment-based biomarker integration for clinical monitoring in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Adam Wawrzeńczyk, Katarzyna Napiórkowska-Baran, Marta Tykwińska, Maciej Szota, Zbigniew Bartuzi, Józef Sławatycki, Alina Kanikowska, Krzysztof Pałgan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adam WawrzeńczykDepartment of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, ul. Ujejskiego 75, Bydgoszcz 85-067, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-1520
Katarzyna Napiórkowska-BaranDepartment of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marta TykwińskaDepartment of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Maciej SzotaDepartment of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Zbigniew BartuziDepartment of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Józef SławatyckiStudent Research Club of Clinical Immunology, Department of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Alina KanikowskaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dietetics and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Krzysztof PałganDepartment of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease in which symptoms correlate imperfectly with histologic and structural activity, necessitating repeated endoscopy for diagnosis and monitoring. As therapeutic options expand, including biologic agents, there is an increasing need for biomarkers that can inform clinical decision-making and support treat-to-target strategies. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on tissue-based, circulating, and minimally invasive biomarkers in EoE and proposes a compartment-based clinical hierarchy to contextualize their performance in routine practice. While type 2 cytokine pathways define disease biology, their systemic measurement demonstrates limited diagnostic and monitoring value. By contrast, tissue transcriptomic signatures and esophageal-proximal assessments-particularly eotaxin-3 and eosinophil-derived granule proteins-show stronger correlation with mucosal inflammation and therapeutic response. Structural and epithelial markers further highlight that histologic remission does not necessarily equate to restoration of mucosal integrity. Across domains, biomarker utility follows a consistent gradient, with tissue and luminal assessments most closely reflecting active disease, whereas circulating markers serve adjunctive roles. Histologic scoring systems remain the reference standard; however, multimodal integration of molecular and minimally invasive tools may enable remodeling-aware monitoring and reduce endoscopy burden in selected clinical contexts. Prospective validation within clearly defined management algorithms is required before routine implementation.

Indexed as

biomarkerseosinophilic esophagitisesophageal string testminimally invasive samplingtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42311924
PMCPMC13269977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.