ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2026
Compartment-based biomarker integration for clinical monitoring in eosinophilic esophagitis.
Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overlapping type 2, barrier, and remodeling endotypes shape clinical expression in eosinophilic esophagitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease in which symptoms correlate imperfectly with histologic and structural activity, necessitating repeated endoscopy for diagnosis and monitoring. As therapeutic options expand, including biologic agents, there is an increasing need for biomarkers that can inform clinical decision-making and support treat-to-target strategies. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on tissue-based, circulating, and minimally invasive biomarkers in EoE and proposes a compartment-based clinical hierarchy to contextualize their performance in routine practice. While type 2 cytokine pathways define disease biology, their systemic measurement demonstrates limited diagnostic and monitoring value. By contrast, tissue transcriptomic signatures and esophageal-proximal assessments-particularly eotaxin-3 and eosinophil-derived granule proteins-show stronger correlation with mucosal inflammation and therapeutic response. Structural and epithelial markers further highlight that histologic remission does not necessarily equate to restoration of mucosal integrity. Across domains, biomarker utility follows a consistent gradient, with tissue and luminal assessments most closely reflecting active disease, whereas circulating markers serve adjunctive roles. Histologic scoring systems remain the reference standard; however, multimodal integration of molecular and minimally invasive tools may enable remodeling-aware monitoring and reduce endoscopy burden in selected clinical contexts. Prospective validation within clearly defined management algorithms is required before routine implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.