ArticleSAGE open nursing
Undergraduate Nursing Students' Experiences in Graduation Research Projects: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Integrating research into nursing education is critical for evidence-based practice and professional development. However, nursing students often encounter significant challenges when engaging in research, which may hinder their academic and clinical growth. Understanding these experiences is essential for optimizing research training in nursing curricula. Objective: This study explored the lived experiences of nursing students participating in graduation research projects, focusing on their perceived benefits, challenges, and support needs. Methods: A descriptive phenomenological approach was employed, and this study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Thirty-eight nursing students (15 male, 23 female) from a Saudi Arabian university participated in focus group discussions between February and May 2024. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, supported by demographic surveys and audio recordings. Colaizzi's descriptive phenomenological method was used for the final analysis. Results: Four central themes emerged: (1) Skill Development and Academic Growth, (2) Mentorship and Peer Support, (3) Barriers to Success, and (4) Curricular Recommendations. Students valued the acquisition of research competencies and their practical applications in clinical practice. Mentorship, peer support, faculty guidance, and collaborative learning were pivotal in navigating research challenges. Prominent hurdles included time constraints, methodological difficulties, and stress. To alleviate pressure, participants recommended curricular adjustments, including extended project timelines (6-12 months) and earlier exposure to research. Conclusion: Graduation research projects are transformative yet demanding experiences for nursing students. While they enhance critical thinking and readiness for advanced studies, structural challenges persist. Institutions should implement targeted interventions, such as phased research training and strengthened mentorship, to foster student success. This study provides actionable insights for nursing educators and policymakers to refine research curricula, ensuring students are better prepared for evidence-based practice and future scholarly pursuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.