ArticleERJ open research2026
The role of artificial intelligence in predicting COPD exacerbations using multimodal data: a systematic review.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: COPD remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with acute exacerbations driving disease progression and healthcare utilisation. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to predict exacerbation risk by integrating multimodal data such as electronic health records (EHRs), spirometry and wearable sensor inputs. Methods: This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251165476), evaluated AI-based models developed for COPD exacerbation prediction using combined data modalities. Results: Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar identified 859 records, of which five studies published between 2021 and 2025 met inclusion criteria. Study designs ranged from prospective monitoring cohorts to EHR-based and hybrid datasets. Models applied diverse approaches including random forests, gradient boosting, convolutional neural networks and ensemble learning frameworks. Reported discriminative performance was moderate to high, with area under the curve values between 0.73 and 0.92 and accuracies up to 0.92. Most of these performance metrics were derived from internal validation, with limited external testing, which restricts assumptions about generalisability. Sensitivity reached 0.94 in wearable-driven models, while only one study reported formal calibration assessment. Conclusions: Despite encouraging performance, methodological heterogeneity, limited external validation and incomplete reporting of preprocessing and explainability methods restrict clinical translation. Current evidence supports the potential of multimodal AI to enhance early detection of COPD exacerbations, but future research must prioritise transparent reporting, external validation and integration into real-world care pathways.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.