ArticleERJ open research2026
International consensus on airway clearance techniques for patients hospitalised with acute exacerbations of COPD: a European Delphi study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite being a proposed treatment, there is no agreement on airway clearance management for patients hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). The aim of this work was to establish international consensus on the selection of airway clearance techniques (ACTs) for these patients and identify which ACTs are commonly used. Methods: A modified Delphi study was employed. A panel of experienced physiotherapists working in Europe (n=162, 12 countries) was invited to respond to two online Delphi survey rounds. A 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) was used; consensus was defined as a median score of ≤2 or ≥4 and 75% agreement. Results: Consensus was reached for the use of seven ACTs, including forced expiratory techniques (FETs), positive expiratory pressure (PEP) and oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (OPEP), in cases of limited treatment time, obesity, low patient motivation or for localised secretions. Consensus was reached against the use of five ACTs, including manual percussion, vibrations and shaking, in patients with resting breathlessness, frailty, obesity or high resting lung volumes. The most used ACTs among participants were PEP, FETs and active cycle of breathing techniques. Participants from nine countries identified ACTs that are commonly used by all of the country's participants. Conclusions: European-based physiotherapists report using a variety of ACTs, with some regional preferences noted in certain countries. Consensus was able to be reached regarding which ACTs should be used or avoided for patients hospitalised with AECOPD under a range of clinical circumstances.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.