ArticleERJ open research2026
BREATHE: an educational approach for optimising the management of chronic respiratory diseases in primary care.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-designing a primary care delivered, breathlessness, self-management intervention for people with chronic respiratory disease.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and aim: Optimisation of underlying chronic respiratory disease (CRD) is a necessary first step to addressing breathlessness. We aimed to develop and evaluate a disease-agnostic education package and mnemonic to support primary care providers to recognise breathlessness and facilitate optimisation of underlying CRD. Methods: A blended education package comprising one live webinar, three self-paced online courses, two podcasts and five case studies was developed by a working group of general practitioners (GPs), respiratory clinicians and researchers and adapted into a practical mnemonic (the BREATHE clinical approach). Content was validated against a systematic state-of-the-art review of international and national guidelines. Semi-structured interviews with GPs, general practice nurses and a practice manager were conducted to evaluate the educational content and design. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically with inductive coding. Results: Seven disease-agnostic recommendations were developed and validated against 33 clinical practice documents: Conclusion: The BREATHE clinical approach and education package were favourably received as useful tools to support primary care providers to optimise treatment for people with CRD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.