ArticleRevista brasileira de ortopedia2026
Association between Sacral Fractures and Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Correlative Study of Fracture Morphologies.
Article in Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate, in a retrospective cohort, the association between sacral fractures and pelvic ring injuries (PRIs) by correlating their respective classification subtypes. Methods: We selected 45 patients admitted to a tertiary trauma center between March 2023 and May 2025. Imaging studies were evaluated for the presence of PRIs and sacral fractures, followed by their classification according to the Tile and Denis systems. Then, a statistical analysis was performed using the McNemar-Bowker test and the Cramér's V coefficient to assess the strength of the association. Results: Among the PRIs classified according to the Tile system, type B was predominant (62.22%), followed by type C (35.56%), and type A (2.22%). Among the sacral fractures classified according to the Denis system, type I was the most prevalent (50%), followed by type II (28.57%), and type III (21.43%). When the classifications were correlated, Tile type-B PRIs showed an 85.7% incidence of associated sacral fractures, 66.6% of which were Denis type I. For Tile type-C PRIs, the incidence of associated sacral fractures was of 100%, with 50% classified as Denis type II. There was a significant association between the Tile and Denis classifications ( Conclusion: The study suggests correlations between PRIs and sacral fracture subtypes, with Tile B-Denis I and Tile C-Denis II representing the most frequent associations. This relationship may facilitate diagnostic investigation and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.