Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311810›Full record

ArticleAffective science2026

Sentiment Analysis of Naturalistic Speech Using Open-Weight Large Language Models.

Jeffrey M Girard, Daiil Jun, Desmond C Ong, Einat Liebenthal, Justin T Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey M GirardDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Room 426, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-3746
Daiil JunDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk Blvd, Room 426, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5494-8417
Desmond C OngDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6781-8072
Einat LiebenthalDivision of Psychotic Disorders, McLean Hospital, Belmont, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4917-8160
Justin T BakerDivision of Psychotic Disorders, McLean Hospital, Belmont, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6629-2195

Funding

Women's Alzheimer's Risk Reduction in MidlifeP20GM152280 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI HEATHER R DESAIRE · 2024 to 2026
$10.0M
Robust Predictors of Mania and PsychosisU01MH116925 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI BAKER, JUSTIN T, RAUCH, SCOTT L · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
SCH: INT: Collaborative Research: Context-Adaptive Multimodal Informatics for Psychiatric Discharge PlanningR01MH125740 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI BAKER, JUSTIN T, DE LA TORRE, FERNANDO · 2021 to 2024
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM152280NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125740NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH116925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological research increasingly relies on computational methods to track emotion in naturalistic text. However, standard lexicon-based tools often miss semantic nuance, while powerful commercial Large Language Models (LLMs) raise privacy concerns for sensitive data. This study evaluates the efficacy of 24 open-weight LLMs (1B-120B parameters) for zero-shot sentiment analysis of spoken language, running entirely on local hardware. In this paradigm, models classify text relying solely on natural language instructions rather than labeled training examples. We compared model performance against three increasingly difficult baselines (naïve, standard, and human) across transcripts from two datasets: 193 autobiographical narratives from community participants (N=49) and 292 longitudinal audio journals from psychiatric outpatients (N=64). Results demonstrate that open-weight models significantly outperform standard lexicon-based sentiment tools and frequently surpass individual human raters. Crucially, certain mid-sized models rival the performance of much larger systems, making state-of-the-art analysis accessible via consumer hardware. Additionally, we validate a fully automated privacy-preserving pipeline, finding that transcription errors from automatic speech recognition did not significantly degrade downstream sentiment accuracy. Despite these strengths, a multidimensional fairness audit revealed several demographic disparities: our best-performing models exhibited miscalibration in specific subgroups, lower sensitivity for female speakers in the community dataset, and lower predictive precision for Black speakers in the clinical dataset. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that recent open-weight LLMs can match or surpass human-level performance in sentiment analysis of naturalistic speech while running efficiently and securely on workstation hardware. These advances open opportunities for studying emotional dynamics in daily life and developing privacy-preserving clinical tools.

Indexed as

Affective computingArtificial intelligenceFairnessLarge language modelsMeasurement validationNatural language processingSentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID42311810
PMCPMC13269563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.