ArticleAffective science2026
When Threat Comes from Within: First Evidence that Anticipatory Emotion Impairs Working Memory.
Article in Affective science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The hierarchical scaffolding model of executive functioning in university students: a self-reported explanatory approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although anticipating threat is known to capture attentional resources, its direct impact on working memory (WM), a core cognitive function supporting everyday activities, has yet to be empirically examined. Given the close dependence of WM on attentional resources, it is therefore reasonable to hypothesize that anticipating threat disrupts WM performance. Moreover, since threat-related attentional bias increases with anxiety, WM disruption caused by anticipatory threat may likewise intensify with anxiety. In Experiment 1, we tested whether anticipating threat captures attentional resources and impairs WM, and whether these effects vary with anxiety. Experiment 2 replicated and extended this design under higher task demands. Participants performed a gamified complex-span task in which each trial occurred in a virtual room associated with the potential appearance of a proximal threat (a sudden screamer), a distal threat (loss of accumulated points), or a neutral condition. Importantly, no threat ever appeared, isolating purely anticipatory processes. Attentional capture was indexed by parity-judgment accuracy, and WM by serial recall. Across both experiments, threat anticipation produced attentional capture and impaired WM. In Experiment 1, attentional capture decreased as anxiety increased, whereas this compensatory pattern disappeared under higher task load in Experiment 2. In contrast, WM impairment increased with cognitive anxiety, particularly under distal threat. These findings provide the first empirical evidence that anticipating threat impairs WM, in line with recent models of emotion, anxiety, and WM. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-026-00363-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.