ArticleCureus2026
Enhancing Maternal Outcomes by Standardizing Epidural Analgesia Practice: A Quality Improvement Project in a Secondary Hospital in Taif City.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction A critical service gap was identified at a secondary military hospital in Taif City, characterized by periods of zero utilization of epidural analgesia (EA) and an elevated baseline cesarean section (CS) rate. This quality improvement (QI) project was initiated to recover EA services, reduce maternal operative morbidity, and improve clinical outcomes through a standardized multidisciplinary practice change. Materials and methods Using a quasi-experimental (retrospective-prospective) design, clinical metrics from the baseline period (January-September 2024) were compared with the post-intervention period (January-September 2025). A multidisciplinary team (anesthesia, obstetrics, nursing, and administration) implemented a three-cycle Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) framework. Interventions included root cause analysis, resource optimization, and data-driven monthly performance huddles. Patient satisfaction was assessed via a prospective cross-sectional comparative study. Results Following the intervention, EA utilization significantly increased from 4.9% (n = 30/610) in 2024 to 13.5% (n = 85/628) in 2025 (χ² (1, N = 1,238) = 26.24, p < .001; Cramer's V = 0.15). The CS rate decreased from 40.2% (n = 410/1,020) to 32.5% (n = 302/930) (χ² (1, N = 1,950) = 12.19, p < .001; Cramer's V = 0.08), while spontaneous vaginal deliveries (SVD) increased from 55.9% (n = 570/1,020) to 63.8% (n = 593/930) (χ² (1, N = 1,950) = 13.06, p < .001; Cramer's V = 0.08). Instrumental delivery rates remained stable at 3.9% (n = 40/1,020) and 3.8% (n = 35/930), respectively (χ² (1, N = 1,950) = 0.15, p = .698). In 2025, patients receiving EA reported significantly higher satisfaction (93.6%; n = 80/85) compared to the non-EA group (76.5%; n = 415/543) (t (626) = 35.15, p < .001). Mean staff satisfaction during implementation was 74.6% (n = 47/63). Conclusions This standardized, consultant-led model successfully optimized labor analgesia and delivery outcomes, providing a resilient and reproducible framework for enhancing maternal safety and institutional resource stewardship at a national scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.