ArticleCureus2026
Effect of Low-Load, Long-Duration Stretching on Pain and Mobility in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) is a significant contributor to low back pain, often causing postural deviation and restricted mobility, disrupting daily life. In this study, a low-load, long-duration (LLLD) stretching protocol was compared to a conventional stretching protocol to evaluate the effects of each intervention. LLLD stretch is a burgeoning technique that applies sustained mild tensile force to augment tissue elasticity, dissipate pain, and enhance joint mobility.
methodsThis investigation employed a comparative study design enrolling 120 participants. The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), provocative tests, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and limb length discrepancy (LLD) were employed as assessment tools in this study. The participants underwent a detailed protocol targeting the hamstrings, iliopsoas, piriformis, and thoracolumbar fascia. Statistical evaluation involved intragroup comparisons conducted using paired-samples t-tests. Intergroup differences in post-intervention outcomes were evaluated using a baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for initial scores as a covariate.
resultsFollowing baseline adjustment, the experimental group demonstrated a greater reduction in pain (NPRS) compared to the control group (F = 65.11, p < 0.001, partial eta squared (ηp
conclusionThe integrated LLLD stretching protocol is more effective for achieving pain relief and functional symmetry in SIJD compared to conventional stretching. However, improvements in general functional mobility remain comparable between the two intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.