ArticleACS ES&T water2026
Preserving Gadolinium Speciation in Environmental Waters: Establishing Hold Times and Storage Protocols for Reliable Analysis.
Article in ACS ES&T water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gadolinium (Gd) has emerged as a trace contaminant in aquatic environments due to the widespread use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostics. This study evaluates how preservation conditions, including temperature, acidification, and filtration, affect the stability of Gd chelates in three water matrices (deionized water, tap water, and river water) using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for total Gd quantification and ion chromatography coupled with ICP-MS (IC-ICP-MS) for individual GBCA quantification. Across all experiments, the linear GBCA was the most susceptible to degradation, with acidification and ion-rich waters accelerating their dissociation, while macrocyclic agents remained more stable. Freezing provided no preservation benefit and sometimes introduced artifacts possibly related to freeze-concentration effects. Filtration improved recoveries in river water by reducing interactions with particulates and microbial activity, and refrigeration slowed degradation but did not fully prevent it in complex matrices. These patterns show that certain preservation choices can alter apparent speciation and lead to underestimation of linear chelates and misinterpretation of GBCA sources. The results provide standardized preservation protocols for sample handling, including avoiding acidification, minimizing storage time, and refrigerating samples when immediate analysis is not possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.