Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311621›Full record

ArticleVascular health and risk management2026

CHA

Celina Wojciechowska, Łukasz Tułecki, Wojciech Jacheć, Dorota Nowosielecka, Paweł Wojciechowski, Anna Polewczyk, Andrzej Kutarski

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Celina Wojciechowska2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-8439
Łukasz TułeckiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, Zamość, Poland.
Wojciech Jacheć2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-9788
Dorota NowosieleckaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, Zamość, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2441-3876
Paweł WojciechowskiStudent's Scientific Group, 2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-6433-0656
Anna PolewczykŚwiętokrzyskie Cardiology Centre, The Jan Kochanowski University and Health Sciences, Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6632-6551
Andrzej Kutarski2nd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3990-1028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity significantly affects prognosis in patients after transvenous lead extraction (TLE). The CHA Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of the CHA Methods: This retrospective study included 3822 patients who underwent non-laser TLE between March 2006 and April 2023 at high-volume centres. The median follow-up was 1848 days (Q1-Q3: 815-3146 days). Patients were stratified into two groups according to CHA Results: Patients with CHA Conclusion: CHA

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationDecision Support TechniquesDefibrillators, ImplantableDevice Lead ExtractionPacemaker, ArtificialAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscardiac implantable electronic deviceCHA2DS2-VASc scorecomorbiditylead extractionmortality riskrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42311621
PMCPMC13269031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.