ArticleNational science review2026
Sliding physical invariant neural operator for long-term prediction of complex dynamics in physical systems.
Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Operator learning aims to simulate the underlying physical system to solve an entire family of partial differential equations (PDEs), rather than focusing on a single instance of an equation. Current approaches encode initial conditions into physical invariants to guide the solution of multiple equations; however, these static physical invariants capture only short-term dynamics and fail to represent long-term evolution, thereby degrading both accuracy and stability over time. In this paper, we introduce the sliding physical invariant neural operator, which integrates physical invariants that slide dynamically with the evolution of the underlying PDEs. Compared with existing methods, our approach achieves substantial error reductions of 34.3%-79.8% in the training domain and 7.7%-76.5% in the future domain, underscoring its markedly enhanced generalization and long-term predictive performance across a wide range of PDE scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.