ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Neural frequency-tagging of syllables in naturalistic speech is sensitive to background noise and age-related hearing loss.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Healthy aging is often accompanied by a loss of hearing sensitivity and a reduced ability to understand speech in both quiet and noisy environments. From a physiological perspective, neural oscillations are thought to fundamentally contribute to parse the speech signal into meaningful units and to extract linguistically relevant information at multiple hierarchical levels. Given that syllables are essential structural elements of the speech signal that recur with quasi-rhythmic periodicity and are firmly anchored in slow amplitude modulations of the acoustic envelope, we exploited the potential of frequency-tagging to examine effects of pure-tone hearing loss and background noise on syllable representation at the neural level. Methods: We used electroencephalography and compared peak amplitudes in a narrow-band frequency range corresponding to the syllabic speech rate in two samples of older adults with normal hearing ( Results: The behavioral indices confirmed that the multi-talker babble noise condition was more demanding, and that hearing loss was generally associated with reduced intelligibility, but not with lower comprehension. Notably, the effects of background noise and hearing loss were also clearly represented at the cortical level, with similar neural response properties. In fact, both acoustically and physiologically impoverished speech signals were expressed in a weaker neural representation of syllables. Discussion: These results provide neurophysiological evidence for an analogous but qualitatively different neural attenuation of syllable representation under adverse listening conditions and in individuals with pure-tone hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.