Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311469›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2026

Use of Heat for the Self-Management of Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review.

Denise Wilfling, Ahmad El-Allawy, Cathleen Muche-Borowski, Thomas Kötter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denise WilflingInstitute of Nursing and Health Sciences, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9366-6757
Ahmad El-AllawyInstitute of Family Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Cathleen Muche-BorowskiDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf - UKE, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas KötterInstitute of Family Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2266-0531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to summarise the evidence on the effectiveness of heat therapy for the treatment of non-specific neck pain, one of the most frequently reported musculoskeletal conditions. Materials and Methods: This review followed established methodological guidelines for systematic reviews. A computerised literature search was conducted in Medline via PubMed in January 2025 using the key terms "neck pain" and "heat". Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised controlled trials, and the quality of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. Results: The database search identified 91 studies, of which only two met the inclusion criteria. A total of 67 participants were included. Both studies investigated dry heat therapy using heat wraps or heat cells. While reductions in neck pain and neck-related disability were reported, the evidence base was very limited due to the small number of included studies, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality of both studies. Conclusion: The current evidence regarding heat therapy for non-specific neck pain is highly limited and insufficient to support either a recommendation for or against its use. The available findings are based on only two small studies with considerable methodological limitations, substantially limiting confidence in the conclusions. Nevertheless, given the absence of expected serious adverse effects, heat application may still be considered as a self-management option for patients with non-specific neck pain.

Indexed as

heatneck painsystematic reviewthermo

Identifiers

PMID42311469
PMCPMC13269032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.