ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Bridging cognition and control through passive eye movement integration in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor Imagery (MI) Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) represent a promising technology for neurorehabilitation and assistive control. However, the clinical viability of these systems is frequently hindered by the inherent limitations of electroencephalography (EEG) with regard to its low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), non-stationarity, and high inter-subject variability. Standard decoding methods often fail to capture the complexity of user intention leading to unreliable performance and user frustration. This review proposes a solution to these challenges by advocating for the integration of passive eye movements (EM) as a complementary data stream. The theoretical rationale for this approach rests on the neurocognitive principle of functional equivalence. Because imagined actions recruit similar visuomotor networks to those used in physical execution, EM constitute a robust correlate of the underlying neural simulation. We distinguish this approach from conventional hybrid systems that use gaze coordinates for active control. Instead, we argue for a framework of passive monitoring where oculomotor metrics, including pupil diameter, fixation patterns, and saccadic dynamics, serve as a continuous window into the user's cognitive state. We synthesize evidence demonstrating that these passive signals can reliably index cognitive load, attentional allocation, and covert motor planning. By fusing these behavioral metrics with EEG, a BCI can disambiguate uncertain neural patterns and verify user intent without imposing additional task demands. Furthermore, we discuss how this multimodal integration enables the development of adaptive classifiers that respond to fluctuations in user fatigue and engagement. Bridging the gap between cognition and control through passive EM monitoring offers a pathway to create BCI systems that are intrinsically responsive to the user's internal state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.