ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Gold Nanoparticle Radiosensitization for High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Differential Efficacy of PEG- and RGD-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles Across 2-Dimensional, 3-Dimensional, and in vivo Prostate Cancer Models.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are promising radiosensitizing agents for radiation therapy; however, their implementation into high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) remains underexplored. Surface functionalization with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or integrin-binding domain RGD impacts their biodistribution and intracellular uptake, but whether active cellular targeting via RGD improves radiosensitization for HDR-BT has not been established in vivo. Methods: Here, we systematically compare the radiosensitization efficacy of non-targeted PEGylated GNPs versus actively targeted PEG-RGD GNPs on PC3 prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, using clinically plausible concentrations, dosing procedures, and purpose-built irradiation platforms. 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-dimensional (3-D) cell cultures, and male NRG mice were irradiated via a 192-Ir source delivered from a clinical HDR-BT afterloader. In vitro samples were dosed at 10 μg [Au]/mL and mice were intratumourally injected with 50 μL at 2 mg [Au]/kg bodyweight. Results: PEGylated GNPs did not elicit any radiosensitization either in 2-D, 3-D, or in vivo. RGD-functionalized GNPs elicited a 17% ( Conclusion: This research represents the first systematic in vitro and in vivo demonstration of GNP-induced radiosensitization using an HDR-BT source with clinically informed intratumoural delivery. Active cellular targeting with RGD functionalization was found to be a critical determinant of radiosensitization efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Both GNP formulations demonstrated tolerability at the delivered dosing concentrations, and further research into the clinical deliverability of GNPs for HDR-BT is necessitated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.