ArticleCase reports in dermatology
Topical Statins in Porokeratosis: Case Report with Focused Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Porokeratosis is a disorder of keratinisation linked to mevalonate pathway defects and often resistant to conventional therapy. Topical statins, which target this pathway directly, represent a rational mechanism-based treatment. Case Presentation: A 63-year-old woman with disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP), refractory to calcipotriol and 5-fluorouracil, was treated with compounded simvastatin 2% cream twice daily. After 6 months, erythema and scale were markedly reduced; thin papules flattened almost completely, whereas hyperkeratotic plaques improved only partially. Treatment was well tolerated without systemic adverse effects, and the patient was maintained on once-daily application to prevent relapse. Literature Review: Evidence from 10 representative reports - including one randomised controlled trial (RCT) and one controlled split-body study - shows reproducible benefit of topical statins across DSAP and selected other variants. Early inflammatory lesions often flatten fastest, whereas older hyperkeratotic plaques improve more slowly; relapse has been reported after discontinuation, supporting the use of maintenance therapy. Safety is favourable, largely mild local irritation, with rare events such as allergic contact dermatitis to simvastatin and transient creatine kinase elevation/myalgia. The role of cholesterol co-formulation remains uncertain: the RCT found no added benefit, while split-face and case reports suggest activity of cholesterol alone in limited contexts. Standardised formulations and larger controlled trials are needed. Conclusion: Topical statins are a promising, low-toxicity therapy for porokeratosis. Larger, controlled studies are needed to standardise formulations, optimise maintenance, and confirm long-term safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.