ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed bionic porous Gyroid structure implant.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the mechanical properties and bone integration capability of bionic gradient porosity Gyroid-structured porous implants. We fabricated porous implants using selective laser melting and large particle sandblasting acid etching techniques, and conducted systematic evaluations through mechanical testing and animal experiments. Mechanical tests demonstrated that the elastic modulus of uniform porosity and gradient porosity Gyroid-structured implants were similar after SLA processing, while the yield strength and compressive strength of gradient porosity Gyroid-structured implants were significantly lower than those of uniform porosity structures. However, all mechanical properties of gradient porosity Gyroid-structured implants matched those of human cancellous bone. Histological examination revealed that at 4 weeks post-implantation, the apical region of gradient Gyroid-structured implants exhibited more new tissue formation compared to uniform porosity Gyroid-structured implants, with no significant difference observed in the neck region. At 8 weeks, bone tissue ingrowth was significantly greater in the neck and apical regions of gradient Gyroid-structured implants compared to uniform porosity Gyroid-structured implants. Additionally, no abnormal inflammatory responses were observed on either type of implant surface. Gradient porosity Gyroid-structured implants demonstrated excellent mechanical properties and enhanced bone integration capabilities, providing a reference for the design of novel implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.