Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311367›Full record

ReviewCampbell systematic reviews2026

Determinants of Weight Gain in Forensic Psychiatric Care: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Justine Anthony, Joseph Marcel-Davies, Maria Goodwin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Campbell systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justine AnthonySchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Joseph Marcel-DaviesSchool of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.
Maria GoodwinSchool of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Campbell Systematic Review. The objective of this paper is to report a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to synthesise and evaluate the evidence on the determinants of weight gain within forensic psychiatric care. This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024586403) and developed in accordance with the PRISMA-P guidelines. Based on the Population, Exposure, Outcome framework, our study will explore demographic, behavioural, psychological, environmental, and pharmacological determinants of weight gain for individuals within forensic inpatient care. We will include adults within forensic inpatient mental health settings and synthesise data on any variable that is measured in accordance with weight gain. Quality of studies will be assessed by the relevant JBI tool. Screening will be undertaken independently by two reviewers, with a third reviewer available to address discrepancies. Data will be extracted using a standardised data extraction tool. Both screening and data extraction will be preceded by a piloting process to ensure consistency between reviewers. This will be the first study to synthesise the evidence and advance understanding of the determinants of weight gain within inpatient settings. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will have important implications for the design and development of weight management interventions within services offering inpatient forensic psychiatric care.

Indexed as

ForensicObesityPsychiatricWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID42311367
PMCPMC13270023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.