ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2026
Acupressure in perinatal care: Results of a cross-sectional study in Malta.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcupressure, the application of firm pressure to specific acupoints, has been associated with benefits during the perinatal period, including reducing nausea, alleviating pain, inducing labor, supporting lactation and decreasing anxiety. While research has explored its effectiveness, little is known about midwives' knowledge and views regarding acupressure and its integration into practice. This study aimed to explore midwives' knowledge, perspectives and factors influencing their use of acupressure during the perinatal period.
methodsA quantitative, cross-sectional survey design was employed using a self-administered online and paper-based questionnaire. This was a total population study utilizing a non-probability sampling technique where the entire population of 240 midwife members of the Malta Midwives Association (MMA) was included. Eligible participants included practicing members in any maternity care setting across the Maltese Islands and these were invited to complete the survey. After conducting a pilot study, data collection took place between July and September 2024, where a total of 94 responses were received. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while open-ended responses underwent thematic analysis.
resultsWhile midwives demonstrated a strong interest in acupressure, their hesitation to practice stemmed primarily from insufficient training (20.7%; n=87), education (19.5%; n=82) and a lack of evidence-based guidelines (16.7%; n=70). Less than half of the respondents reported practicing acupressure (12.8%; n=12), with most expressing uncertainty about the location of various acupoints and acupoints contraindicated before 37 weeks of gestation (61.7% to 87.2% across all acupoints). Findings from thematic analysis highlighted that increased maternal interest in natural approaches, creates a corresponding need for enhanced midwifery expertise in acupressure.
conclusionsThe findings revealed midwives' lack of adequate knowledge, education and training in using acupressure during the perinatal period. These themes mirrored the quantitative findings, reinforcing that interest in acupressure is present among Maltese midwives but is constrained by gaps in knowledge, training and policy support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.