Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311336›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT

Hospital management and psychosocial risks: challenges and opportunities in the face of regulatory transition.

Fernanda Maria de Miranda, Karine de Oliveira Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fernanda Maria de MirandaUniversidade Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera, São Carlos, SP, Brazil; Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-2827
Karine de Oliveira SilvaHospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de São Carlos (HU-UFSCar), São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6560-9868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The update of Regulatory Standard No. 1 issued by the Brazilian Ministry of Labor and Employment represents progress by formally recognizing psychosocial risks as an integral part of occupational risks. This change requires organizations to adopt new practices aimed at preventing illness through more comprehensive assessments of psychosocial risks present in the workplace. This study conducted an integrative review with the objective of analyzing how psychosocial risks have been addressed in the scientific literature related to hospital risk management. Nine articles published between 2019 and 2025 were included. Of these, five directly addressed psychosocial risks, although the hospital environment is recognized as a critical context regarding workers' mental suffering. Limitations were observed in the use of validated instruments for assessing these risks. The new wording of the standard may act as a catalyst for structural changes in risk management practices, promoting more integrated strategies that consider technical, subjective, and relational aspects of the work environment. It is concluded that, although psychosocial risks are recognized in the theoretical field, their practical incorporation into hospital institutions still occurs incipiently. Strengthening institutional policies and conducting future studies to evaluate the impacts of regulatory changes on the Brazilian hospital reality are recommended.

Indexed as

hospitalslaborlegislationmental healthoccupational health.risk management

Identifiers

PMID42311336
PMCPMC13271038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.