ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Generalizable framework for multi-site bone density prediction using non-dominant wrist optical biomarkers.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disorder characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and elevated fracture risk, particularly in aging populations. This study presents a machine learning framework for intelligent optical bone densitometry (iOBD) using near-infrared (NIR) wrist imaging as a non-invasive alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Among six imaging configurations (three wavelengths × bilateral wrists), 940 nm left wrist images were selected based on superior tissue penetration and reduced inter-subject variability. Features extracted from preprocessed NIR images using a pre-trained VGG16 network were combined with physiological data to predict BMD at five DXA sites. Model benchmarking across eight feature-regressor combinations identified the VGG16 + KNN model as optimal, achieving a test mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 8.5% and a correlation coefficient of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.