ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Automated anatomically guided quality assessment for OCTA via multi-region analysis and statistical calibration.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Technology and Applications of Optical Sensing and Imaging for Biomedicine: introduction.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) requires not only high-resolution acquisition but also standardized image quality control to ensure accurate vascular quantification. However, existing quality assessment approaches largely rely on subjective grading or global image descriptors and do not account for the region-dependent characteristics of OCTA decorrelation signals. Here, we propose an anatomically informed OCTA quality assessment framework that integrates multi-region segmentation with statistically calibrated semi-supervised learning. The segment anything model is employed to partition each image into large vessels, capillary networks, and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), enabling that region-specific evaluation accounts for heterogeneous artifact sensitivity and optical signal formation mechanisms. Physically interpretable metrics, including vessel edge sharpness, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio, are extracted to construct a decorrelation-grounded feature space. A distribution-calibrated grading strategy with a modulation factor of 0.9 is introduced to support stable grading under limited annotations. Evaluated on the public OCTA-500 dataset and an independent clinical dataset, the framework achieves an average Dice coefficient of 81.21 percent for region segmentation and a grading accuracy of 90.0 percent with a Cohen kappa of 0.864. By transforming global heuristic scoring into anatomically resolved and measurement-consistent evaluation, the framework supports automated data filtering for AI training pipelines and can be integrated into OCT acquisition workflows for device-level performance calibration and standardized quality control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.