ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Image stitching for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy via a motion consistency constraint.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables in vivo optical biopsy with cellular resolution, but its limited field of view makes large-area tissue inspection difficult and necessitates image stitching. Under clinically relevant probe motion, variable-speed acquisition introduces nonlinear scanning distortion and severe inter-frame deformation, making stable registration and globally consistent stitching difficult. Here, we propose an incremental pCLE image stitching framework whose core is a non-rigid registration method, termed probe motion space-based mismatch rejection (PMS-MR). The main innovation is a motion consistency constraint for robust mismatch rejection and deformation estimation. To achieve this, the point scanning mechanism for confocal imaging is exploited to map feature correspondences into the probe motion space (PMS). Experimental results show that, compared with state-of-the-art registration methods, the proposed method achieves competitive pairwise registration and more reliable stitching, keeps the cumulative error on a standard target within 4 pixels, and supports large-area mosaic reconstruction over 400 frames for clear visualization of lesion boundaries. These results indicate that the proposed method supports stable, globally consistent extension of the field of view and facilitates more flexible probe manipulation in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.