ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Liquid biopsy-guided kidney-sparing management in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: from preoperative risk stratification to perioperative surveillance.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) presents a clinically important gap in urologic oncology: treatment intensity is determined before surgery, yet conventional preoperative risk stratification remains imperfect. Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) is established for selected low-risk disease and is increasingly considered when renal preservation is clinically important, but safe selection depends on distinguishing technically manageable tumors from biologically unsuitable disease. Computed tomography urography (CTU), cytology, ureteroscopy, and ureteroscopic biopsy remain indispensable, although they describe anatomy and morphology more reliably than tumor biology. Urine-based liquid biopsy platforms, including DNA methylation, mutational, multiplex RNA, copy-number, and protein assays, appear most mature for noninvasive detection and preoperative triage. Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), in contrast, appears more closely linked to biological upstaging, occult muscle-invasive or non-organ-confined disease, perioperative risk refinement, and molecular residual disease surveillance. This review follows the KSS decision chain from patient selection to postoperative monitoring. We emphasize that current evidence supports liquid biopsy as an adjunctive, decision-enhancing layer rather than a replacement for imaging, ureteroscopy, pathology, or multidisciplinary judgment. Future studies should move beyond isolated sensitivity and specificity estimates and test whether biomarker-informed pathways improve treatment allocation, renal preservation, surveillance burden, and oncologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.