Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311231›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

An integrated evolution-aware meta-learning framework with adversarial morphological augmentation for zero-day threat detections.

Kavitha Lanka, Kareemulla Shaik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kavitha LankaSchool of Computer Science Engineering, VIT-A.P University, Amaravati, India.
Kareemulla ShaikSchool of Computer Science Engineering, VIT-A.P University, Amaravati, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Most modern threat detection frameworks rely on fixed class definitions and retrospective signatures derived from historical data, limiting their ability to adapt to evolving attack behaviors. However, contemporary threats are increasingly polymorphic, adaptive, and include a growing number of zero-day attacks, making traditional pattern-matching approaches insufficient. With expanding attack surfaces across cloud environments, IoT systems, and heterogeneous infrastructures, detection systems must move beyond static similarity matching and instead account for the evolutionary nature of threats. Despite advances, both deep learning-based and traditional anomaly detection approaches face critical limitations. Deep learning models often suffer from data scarcity, concept drift, poor uncertainty calibration, and limited causal interpretability, while conventional anomaly detection methods exhibit slow training, weak generalization, and reduced adaptability to novel attack patterns. Methods: To address these challenges, we propose M Results and discussion: Overall, M

Indexed as

adversarial data augmentationanalysisevolutionary threat modelingmeta-learninguncertainty-aware detectionzero-day attacks

Identifiers

PMID42311231
PMCPMC13269406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.