Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311200›Full record

Observational studyJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2026

Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Nurses' Mental Health: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study in Northern France.

Eliane Bourgeois, Ahmed Benaiche, Maryvonne Decroix, Richard Flahaut, Abdelhamed Haddouche, Julia Poprawa, Antoine Lamer, Marielle Wathelet

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eliane BourgeoisEPSM Val de Lys-Artois, Saint-Venant, France.
Ahmed BenaichePôle de Psychiatrie, CH Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France.
Maryvonne DecroixEPSM Lille Métropole, Armentières, France.
Richard FlahautEPSM Val de Lys-Artois, Saint-Venant, France.
Abdelhamed HaddoucheEPSM de L'agglomération Lilloise, Saint-André-lez-Lille, France.
Julia PoprawaIDAC Camiers, Camiers, France.
Antoine LamerF2RSM Psy - Fédération Régionale de Recherche en Santé Mentale et Psychiatrie Des Hauts-de-France, Saint-André-Lez-Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1808
Marielle WatheletF2RSM Psy - Fédération Régionale de Recherche en Santé Mentale et Psychiatrie Des Hauts-de-France, Saint-André-Lez-Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3301-4148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNurses are at high risk for mental health problems, including anxiety and depression, as well as burnout symptoms. The COVID-19 pandemic intensified these challenges, yet little is known about its long-term impact.

aimTo assess the prevalence of burnout symptoms, anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation among nurses in Northern France 2 years after the pandemic began, and to identify their risk and protective factors.

methodsThe COSMIN study is a multicentre cross-sectional survey conducted in eight public hospitals in Hauts-de-France. Data were collected via an anonymous online questionnaire (May-October 2022), using validated scales (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory). Logistic regression identified associated factors.

resultsAmong 632 respondents, 25% had at least one clinically significant mental health problem: 16.5% anxiety, 2.5% depression, 13.9% burnout and 4.4% suicidal ideation. Burnout included professional (13.0%), personal (8.7%) and relational (5.1%) forms. Despite a decline from earlier phases, vigilance-level symptoms remained common. History of mental health problems increased risk, while institutional supports, especially multidisciplinary meetings, were protective. Personal impacts included increased conflict and breakups. DISCUSSION: Mental health symptoms remain prevalent among nurses post-pandemic. Supportive measures appear beneficial. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Reinforcing institutional support and mental health resources is essential to address ongoing distress and protect care quality. RELEVANCE TO MENTAL HEALTH NURSING: This study highlights the enduring psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nurses, revealing high rates of burnout, anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation 2 years after the crisis began. It underscores the critical role of institutional support-such as multidisciplinary meetings and supervision-in protecting staff well-being. These findings are directly relevant to mental health nursing by informing strategies to support nurses' psychological health, improve working conditions, and maintain the quality of patient care. The results advocate for the integration of structured mental health support within nursing practice and organizational policies in post-crisis healthcare settings.

Indexed as

AnxietyBurnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19DepressionNursing Staff, HospitalSuicidal IdeationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceanxietyburnoutCOVID‐19 pandemicdepressionnursessuicidal ideationsupport measures

Identifiers

PMID42311200
PMCPMC13551292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.